• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • The Complete Nevadan

    In-Depth Coverage of the Silver State

    The Complete Nevadan
    • News
    • Sports
    • Opinion
    • About
    • Writers Wanted
  • You are here: Home / Featured / Opinion / PERS should stop trying to hide public records

    PERS should stop trying to hide public records

    March 16, 2018 By The Complete Nevadan Leave a Comment

    by The Complete Nevadan
    March 16, 2018Filed under:
    • Opinion

    The Public Employees’ Retirement System should stop wasting taxpayer money and release the records of Nevada public employee retiree payments as the courts previously ordered them to do.

    The Reno Gazette-Journal sued for these records in 2013 and won in the state Supreme Court, which found the records are clearly covered under the state public records law. The records were released, but the very next year PERS changed how their files are maintained in an obvious ruse to dodge the clear meaning of the court ruling. PERS now says their files do not contain names of retirees, but only Social Security numbers, which are confidential. They also say the law does not require them to create a new document from existing computer files, even though a past state Supreme Court in another case required just such a document creation.

    Nevada Policy Research Institute sued PERS​ and the Supreme Court heard the case this past week.

    ​This past summer District Court Judge James Wilson spelled out clearly his rationale for requiring the records to be released:​ “Considering the purpose of the NPRA (Nevada Public Records Act), to foster democratic principles by providing member of the public with access to public books and records; the legislative mandate that courts construe the NPRA liberally to carry out this important purpose; the legislative mandate that any exemption, exception or balancing of interests which limits or restricts access to public books and records by members of the public must be construed narrowly; the lack of evidence that producing the requested information, retiree name, years of service credit, gross pension benefit amount, year of retirement, and last employer would require unreasonable demands or costs on PERS; the fact that PERS altered its procedure in providing information to its actuary to eliminate the names of retirees in part because of the Reno Newspapers decision, the court concludes that PERS does have a duty to create a document that contains the requested information.​“

    ​During this past week’s hearing Chief Justice Michael Douglas suggested that PERS had “gone out of its way to violate the spirit of the law.” Indeed it has.

    All NPRI is seeking is ​ retiree name, payroll amount, date of retirement, years of service, last employer, retirement type, original retirement amount, and cost of living increases.

    PERS argues there is some vague possibility of identity theft or fraud if this information is released, though the courts have ruled such supposition cannot outweigh the public’s right to know how their tax dollars are spent.

    In fact, the Supreme Court has all ready addressed and adjudicated this in the Reno newspaper suit in 2013, saying, “Because PERS failed to present evidence to support its position that disclosure of the requested information would actually cause harm to retired employees or even increase the risk of harm, the record indicates that their concerns were merely hypothetical and speculative.

    “Therefore, because the government’s interests in nondisclosure in this instance do not clearly outweigh the public’s presumed right to access, we conclude that the district court did not err in balancing the interests involved in favor of disclosure.”

    NPRI’s attorney Joseph Becker argued in a brief filed with the court that the law “states that the purpose of PERS is to, ‘provide a reasonable base income to those whose earning capacity has been removed or substantially reduced,’ previously released records indicate that there are retirees in their 40’s collecting six figure disbursements from PERS while still earning income from other sources. … Only through the publication of name, pension payout and related data can the public better understand how the system works and the legislative purpose be effectuated. … Additionally, because lawmakers can directly profit from decisions they make pertaining to PERS, there is an overwhelming need for the public to have comprehensive access to this information.” Seems persuasive to us.

    PERS should stop stalling and release the records. — TM

    Tagged:
    • PERS

    Post navigation

    Previous Post Barkitecture Las Vegas coming to Downtown Summerlin
    Next Post Let the public see the work of public servants

    Reader Interactions

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Primary Sidebar

    Recent Posts

    • IsThis You? Wall to Wall
    • Opinion: Judge blocks state grouse protection plans
    • Mitchell: Asylum seekers should prove their claims
    • Mineral County Independent-News: First African American Adjutant general in NV National Guard
    • The Ely Times: Traveling war memorial coming to White Pine County
    • Facebook
    • Twitter

    Copyright © 2021 · Milan Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in